As I read the book I noticed The Chief used machines many
times to describe the Big Nurse and the people in the ward. However, it was not
until I read further on that I saw that The Chief really believed people were
machines and had nothing inside except for “rust, ashes wire or glass” (pg.
79). I believe Kesey is symbolizing human behavior and society with machines.
There is no soul, no real feelings: just detached material things.
The machines symbolize society in the sense of the routine
all people who are part of the conformist society have. They have a schedule
and an order of things, so when things go differently in the ward the Chief
blames it on an error on the machinery:
“Whatever it was went haywire in the mechanism, they’ve just about got it fixed again. The clean calculated arcade movement is coming back.” (Pg. 155)
For me this not only shows how society is a machine, but how
we are machines that follow this
routine and if something goes wrong with it ,we fail too. It’s like if we were
part of a factory and society was the “parent” machine that kept us going, if
it fails we fail with it.
I believe it is already clear that the hospital is a
small-scale model of society in which the Big Nurse is the ultimate authority. The
Big Nurse, in page 6, is described as a doll, something with no feelings, only
a mechanical object. She would be the main machine from which the others
operate. The patients, more specifically the chronics, are individual machines that
can’t operate on their own because they “are machines with flaws inside that
can’t be repaired”. However, these flaws are only flaws in societies’ eyes. They
symbolize the structure that society makes people follow, and when someone
doesn’t conform with it they are seen as crazy or as defective machines. Does
this mean the patients are really crazy? Or are they just don’t conform with
society’s standards, and have a different way of following them?
In other words, they are
really machines that have a different way of operating because their wiring is
different from what is commonly known.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario